Judul
|
:
|
Trade and Growth Horizons for Nusa Tenggara Timur and Timor-Leste
|
Penulis
|
:
|
David Roland-Holst & Barend Frielink
|
Penerbit
|
:
|
Asian Development Bank
|
Bahasa
|
:
|
Inggris
|
Tahun Cetak
|
:
|
2009
|
Halaman
|
:
|
37
|
ISBN
|
:
|
-
|
Sumber
|
:
|
|
Download
|
:
|
This report evaluates the prospects for trade and
economic growth for two proximate economies in the Indonesian archipelago, Nusa
Tenggara Timur (NTT), Indonesia, and the independent state of Timor-Leste
(TIM). Both have very low incomes and predominantly rural populations (mainly
subsistence farmers and food-insecure households), and both are at the early
stages of development with limited regional and global trade linkages. TIM has
historically been implicated in disruptive civil strife, which continues to
pose risks to existing and prospective economic assets. However, considerable
potential exists in both economies relative to today’s living standards.
Trade-oriented development of value-added activities associated with the
primary sector, including agro food and labor-intensive light industry and
services such as tourism might offer important diversification and alleviate
social risks from very high current under- and un-employment rates.
A primary impediment to development appears to be real
and de facto trade and investment barriers. Real trade barriers consist
primarily of infrastructure deficiencies, including port and supporting
transport and communication facilities, as well as soft infrastructure to
facilitate more efficient trade/investment promotion and supervision. De facto
trade barriers comprise a wide array of informal obstacles, including apparent
underperformance of border clearance functions, bilateral contractual and
market failures, and, sometimes, outright resistance on the part of some toward
bilateral flows of goods, services, and persons.
Our review of available evidence suggests that
increased trade could be a potent catalyst for growth in both economies, and
this report assesses the prospects for such trade expansion. Importantly, our
findings indicate that apparent home-market bias is a serious mercantilist
fallacy, as growth of exports from more open trade would be much more robust
than import growth. In particular, public and private investments to facilitate
trade could increase exports as a percent of gross domestic product more than
twice as fast as imports, offering both economies significant growth leverage
from new external demand and savings inflows. Taken together, the results of
this review strongly support an outward-oriented agenda of public and private
trade facilitation, including much more determined infrastructure investments
for domestic, regional, and global market access, accompanied by public and
private capacity development for more effective development of trade and
investment opportunities.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar